Comparing HL7 v2 vs FHIR data models – Which one improves implementer usability healthcare interoperability?

  • Post category:Blog
Comparing HL7 v2 vs FHIR data models – Which one improves implementer usability healthcare interoperability?


Health Level Seven (HL7) v2 and Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) are two prominent data models in the healthcare industry. HL7 v2, a widely used standard, employs ASCII text-based messages and requires custom coding for interoperability. In contrast, FHIR, introduced in 2014, is an open standard that enables seamless data exchange between applications and legacy systems through modern web technologies such as RESTful APIs, XML, and JSON.

Importance of Healthcare Interoperability

Healthcare interoperability is different from any other domain, the ability of different healthcare information systems and software applications to communicate, exchange data, and use the exchanged information, plays a crucial role in improving patient care, streamlining workflows, and enhancing operational efficiency within healthcare organizations.

Understanding HL7 v2 Data Model

The HL7 v2 data model is a widely used healthcare even today. It is a text-based messaging standard that enables the exchange of health information between different systems and organizations. Here’s a detailed explanation of the HL7 v2 data model, along with its use cases and its role in Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems and Health Information Exchange (HIE):

The HL7 v2 data model is based on a hierarchical structure where messages are organized into segments, fields, and components. Each segment represents a specific type of information such as patient demographics, clinical observations, or laboratory results. Within each segment, there are fields that contain individual data elements, and these fields can be further divided into components. For example, in the PID segment (Patient Identification), there are fields for patient name, date of birth, gender, and so on.

Use cases for HL7 v2 in healthcare data management

HL7 v2 is used in various healthcare settings for different purposes such as:

  1. Exchanging patient information between EHR systems
  2. Transmitting lab results to clinicians
  3. Sharing clinical data between hospitals

It enables interoperability among different healthcare applications and systems by providing a standardized format for exchanging data. For example, when a patient visits a hospital where they don’t have an existing medical record, the hospital can request the patient’s medical history from their previous healthcare provider using HL7 v2 messages.

In summary, the HL7 v2 data model provides a standardized framework for exchanging healthcare information. Its hierarchical structure allows for efficient organization and transmission of data.

Exploring the Advantages of FHIR Data Model for Interoperability

FHIR, or Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources, has revolutionized healthcare data exchange with its modern approach and focus on implementer usability. Let’s explore the advantages of the FHIR data model in enhancing healthcare interoperability:

  1. Comprehensive Overview of the FHIR Data Model

FHIR is an open standard that simplifies data exchange between different healthcare systems and applications. It utilizes modern web technologies such as RESTful APIs, XML, and JSON to enable a wider community of developers to create innovative healthcare IT solutions.

  1. Advantages of using FHIR for Mobile Health (mHealth) Applications

FHIR’s flexibility and support for modern web technologies make it ideal for developing mobile health applications. Its RESTful API architecture allows seamless integration with mobile platforms, facilitating the secure exchange of health data between patients, providers, and other stakeholders.

  1. Utilization of FHIR in Facilitating Telemedicine Consultations

In the context of telemedicine, FHIR enables the seamless exchange of patient data between different telemedicine platforms and electronic health record systems. This ensures that healthcare providers have access to relevant patient information during virtual consultations, leading to more informed decision-making and improved patient care.

  1. Benefits for Healthcare Software Development Companies

For healthcare software development companies like Santeware Healthcare Solutions, FHIR offers a standardized approach to data exchange, reducing the complexity and time required to integrate with various healthcare systems. This not only accelerates the development process but also ensures that their solutions can seamlessly interact with a wide range of existing healthcare infrastructure.

FHIR’s adaptability and focus on modern technologies make it well-suited for addressing the evolving needs of the healthcare industry, particularly in the context of mobile health applications and telemedicine consultations. Its standardized approach also streamlines the development process for healthcare software companies, ultimately contributing to improved interoperability across the healthcare ecosystem.

When comparing HL7 V2 and FHIR data models, it’s important to understand the key differences between these two standards and examine their interoperability features.

Key Differences between HL7 v2 and FHIR Data Models

Message Structure

HL7 V2 messages are text-based and have a fixed structure, which can make it challenging to accommodate new data elements. In contrast, FHIR uses a more flexible and modern approach with its resource-based model, allowing for easier integration of new data elements.


HL7 V2 has limited interoperability due to its rigid structure. On the other hand, FHIR’s RESTful APIs and use of standard web formats such as JSON and XML enable better interoperability across different systems and devices.


HL7 V2 messages often require custom code for parsing and processing, leading to complexity in implementation. FHIR, with its use of modern web standards, reduces the complexity of data exchange and integration.

By comparing HL7 V2 with FHIR data models, it becomes evident that FHIR’s focus on flexibility and implementer usability significantly improves healthcare interoperability compared to the older HL7 standards. The advancements in technology and the shift towards modern, web-based architectures have propelled FHIR as a more adaptable and interoperable solution for healthcare data exchange.

Implementing FHIR for Enhanced Healthcare Interoperability

Implementing the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) data model is a crucial step towards achieving enhanced healthcare interoperability. FHIR offers several features and strategies that can be leveraged to ensure seamless data exchange and meaningful use of healthcare information. Here are some key considerations when implementing FHIR for enhanced healthcare interoperability:

Role of FHIR profiles in ensuring semantic interoperability

FHIR profiles play a vital role in ensuring semantic interoperability by defining the structure, constraints, and semantics of resources. These profiles provide a common understanding of how different systems should interpret and exchange data. By adhering to standardized profiles, healthcare organizations can ensure consistent data representation, enabling better collaboration and data sharing across systems.

FHIR’s compatibility with different clinical workflows

One of the significant advantages of FHIR is its flexibility to accommodate various clinical workflows. FHIR resources can be customized to fit specific use cases and workflows, allowing healthcare organizations to map their existing processes seamlessly. For example, FHIR supports resources such as Observation, MedicationAdministration, and Procedure that can be easily integrated into clinical workflows, facilitating efficient data capture and exchange.

Utilizing RESTful architectures for efficient FHIR implementation

FHIR is built on RESTful web service principles, which offer several benefits for efficient implementation. RESTful architectures enable lightweight communication between systems using standard HTTP methods like GET, POST, PUT, and DELETE. This simplicity allows developers to quickly build applications that interact with FHIR servers and retrieve or update patient data. Additionally, RESTful architectures support scalability and adaptability, making it easier to integrate new technologies or scale existing infrastructure.

Ensuring HIPAA compliance when exchanging data using FHIR

As healthcare organizations exchange sensitive patient data through FHIR interfaces, it is crucial to ensure compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Organizations should implement security measures such as encryption, access controls, and audit trails to protect patient privacy and maintain data integrity. Compliance with HIPAA regulations ensures that healthcare data is securely transmitted and accessed by authorized entities only.

Challenges and considerations in integrating FHIR with existing healthcare systems

Integrating FHIR with existing healthcare systems may pose some challenges due to legacy infrastructure and varying data formats. It is essential to evaluate the compatibility of existing systems with FHIR standards and identify potential gaps or conflicts. Additionally, organizations should consider the migration process, potential disruptions during implementation, and staff training requirements. By addressing these challenges proactively, healthcare organizations can smoothly transition to FHIR while minimizing any negative impact on operations.


The FHIR data model offers significant advantages over the HL7 v2 data model when it comes to healthcare interoperability. By embracing the benefits of FHIR, healthcare organizations can greatly improve their data management and exchange processes.

One key advantage of FHIR is its focus on implementer usability. The FHIR data model simplifies the onboarding of new data exchange partners, making it easier for different systems and devices to communicate with each other. This ease of use encourages widespread adoption and facilitates seamless data sharing across various healthcare applications.

Additionally, FHIR’s flexibility allows for innovation and customization in healthcare IT solutions. With its support for multiple paradigms and architectures, developers have the freedom to create tailored solutions that meet specific needs. This adaptability ensures that FHIR can easily integrate with existing systems and workflows, reducing disruption during implementation.

While FHIR offers numerous benefits, it is important to acknowledge that HL7 v2 has been widely used in the healthcare industry for many years. Rather than completely replacing HL7 v2, a hybrid approach can be considered where both models coexist and complement each other. This allows organizations to leverage the strengths of each model and gradually transition towards a more seamless and efficient data exchange process.

In conclusion, by embracing the FHIR data model and its focus on implementer usability, healthcare organizations can significantly enhance their interoperability efforts. The potential for a hybrid approach ensures a smooth transition while maximizing the benefits of both HL7 v2 and FHIR in achieving seamless healthcare data exchange.

Leave a Reply